In-roof vs on-roof solar — UK new build solar PV installation
Comparison guide

In-roof vs on-roof solar for new builds

The two ways to install solar PV on a new build roof — in-roof systems integrated below the tile line, or on-roof systems mounted above the existing roof covering. Both meet FHS compliance. Here's how to choose between them.

In-roof and on-roof are the two installation methodologies that dominate UK new-build solar PV. They install the same panels with the same inverters and offer the same warranties — what differs is how the array integrates with the roof structure, how it looks from street elevation, how much it costs per installed kWp, and how it sits within your construction programme. For volume new-build work, in-roof has become the default; for self-build the choice is more balanced. This page explains both in detail.

Option 1

In-roof solar

Panels integrated below the tile line — they replace the tiles/slates over the array area and sit flush with the surrounding roof covering.

  • Lower visual profile — looks part of the roof
  • Offsets cost of underlying tiles/slates
  • Factory pre-fit on roof cassettes possible
  • Faster install — concurrent with roofing
Option 2

On-roof solar

Panels mounted on rails above the existing roof covering — the more common retrofit approach, also valid for new builds.

  • Cheaper per kWp installed (~£140/kWp less)
  • Easier maintenance access
  • Better panel ventilation, slightly higher efficiency
  • Works on any roof age

Detailed cost comparison

On a 3.4 kWp new build installation (typical 3-bed semi), the installed system cost breaks down as follows:

Cost lineIn-roofOn-roof
Panels (8 × 425W)£1,360£1,360
Inverter (5kW hybrid)£820£820
Mounting hardware£480 (in-roof tray)£280 (rails & feet)
Installation labour£640£540
Cabling, monitoring, MCS£550£550
Sub-total installation£3,850£3,550
Offset: tiles/slates not needed−£420£0
Net new-build cost£3,430£3,550

In-roof is therefore approximately £120 cheaper net on a typical new-build 3.4 kWp installation once the displaced roof covering is accounted for. The cost advantage grows on larger systems: a 5.2 kWp 4-bed detached installation saves ~£200 net under in-roof vs on-roof.

Programme implications

For volume housebuilders the programme advantage of in-roof is significant. On-roof requires the roof to be 100% complete before installation can begin, then a 1-day install crew per plot, then sign-off. In-roof can be installed concurrently with roofing (panel cassettes drop into pre-formed tray openings as the tiling progresses) or even factory pre-fit onto panelised roof cassettes off-site and delivered just-in-time to the roofing stage.

Factory pre-fit on a panelised roof cassette typical timing: panels installed on the cassette at our pre-fab facility (4 hours), cassette delivered to site, cassette craned into position with the rest of the roof (no additional time), on-site final electrical connection (2 hours per plot). Total site labour: ~2 person-hours per plot. The equivalent on-roof site labour: ~10 person-hours per plot.

Aesthetics and street elevation

In-roof systems sit flush with the surrounding roof covering — the visual profile is a low rectangular panel area integrated into the tile line. On-roof systems sit 50-80 mm proud of the roof on rails — the panels are clearly distinguishable from the roof at any viewing angle.

Volume housebuilders increasingly specify in-roof because it produces a less industrial street elevation across an estate — important for sales appeal in the buyer-facing show home photography. Self-builders making personal aesthetic decisions split roughly 60/40 in favour of in-roof on architect-led projects we work on.

Where neither in-roof nor on-roof is acceptable (Conservation Areas, listed-curtilage plots, sensitive heritage settings), BIPV solar tile or slate systems are the planning-compliant alternative — see our case study at Cotswolds Conservation Area.

Our recommendation

For new builds we specify in-roof as the default on 90%+ of installations. The aesthetic, programme and net cost advantages outweigh the modest efficiency reduction (in-roof runs ~3-4% lower annual generation due to reduced rear-panel ventilation). On-roof remains the right choice for: (a) retrofit to existing dwellings; (b) flat roofs requiring ballasted mounting; (c) installations on roofs over 30 years old where in-roof tray detailing is uneconomic.

40% of ground floor area
PV / ground floor area
Mar 2027
FHS in force
75%
CO₂ vs 2013 baseline
£4,350 per dwelling
Per-plot premium
For developers and housebuilders

In-roof vs on-roof solar PV for volume new-build programmes

Per-plot pricing locked at procurement. Factory pre-fit on panelised roof cassettes. SAP/HEM modelling for every house type included. NHBC, LABC, Premier and Buildmark warranty-accepted workmanship. 20-year insurance-backed system warranty. We work with developers from 50 plots to 5,000+ across multi-site frameworks — agreed pricing, agreed programme, agreed warranty stack.

For self-builders and architects

In-roof vs on-roof solar PV for one-off custom builds

Engagement from RIBA Stage 2. PV sizing collaborative with the architect. SAP/HEM modelling that gives the architect freedom on glazing ratios and roof geometry. Building Control submission pack ready for the Approved Inspector. 0% VAT on new-build dwellings. Staged invoicing aligned to your self-build mortgage drawdowns. We work with custom-build buyers across England, Wales and Scotland.

How this fits into the FHS compliance pathway

Every FHS-compliant new build must pass three regulatory gates. In-roof vs on-roof solar PV fits primarily into the second gate — design-stage Part L compliance — but has knock-on implications for Building Control sign-off and post-completion warranty:

  1. 1
    Planning permission Most solar PV on new dwellings is consented within the dwelling\'s primary planning consent. Conservation Areas, Article 4 directions and listed-curtilage plots require additional planning consideration — we handle the planning evidence required for these.
  2. 2
    Building Control — Part L compliance SAP 10.3 or HEM compliance modelling demonstrating Dwelling Emission Rate ≤ Target Emission Rate. PV specification, ASHP capacity, fabric U-values and air permeability all entered into the modelling. We provide the full compliance file ready for the Approved Inspector.
  3. 3
    Post-completion — warranty & EPC MCS certificate, EPC, monitoring app onboarding and 20-year insurance-backed workmanship warranty. NHBC, LABC, Premier and Buildmark all accept our installation specification without query — important if you\'re relying on a structural warranty for buyer mortgageability.

For a fuller walkthrough of the compliance process, see our Part L 2026 page and the FHS PV calculator which sizes a compliant system from your ground floor area in 30 seconds.

FAQ — in-roof vs on-roof

Which is cheaper — in-roof or on-roof solar?
On-roof is cheaper on a like-for-like installation basis (~£1,150/kWp installed vs ~£1,290/kWp for in-roof). But on a new build, in-roof avoids the cost of the underlying roof tiles or slates it displaces (~£35-50/m² saved). Net cost difference on a typical 3.4 kWp new build installation: in-roof is roughly £180 more expensive than on-roof but produces a markedly better aesthetic, which most volume housebuilders prefer for sales appeal.
Does in-roof affect roof weatherproofing?
No — in-roof systems include integral weatherproofing membrane and have been fully tested to BS EN 13501-5 fire spread and BS EN 12865 driving rain. NHBC, LABC, Premier and Buildmark all accept properly-installed in-roof systems without warranty reserve. The most common warranty issue is improper detailing at the flashing junctions, addressed through manufacturer-trained installation crews.
Which is faster to install on a new build programme?
In-roof is faster on a new build because it goes in concurrently with the roof tiling rather than after. On-roof requires the roof to be fully completed before the installation crew can attend — typically a 2-3 week programme delay vs in-roof. Factory pre-fit of in-roof on panelised roof cassettes accelerates the programme further; on-roof has no equivalent shortcut.
Can in-roof be retrofitted to an existing build?
Technically yes but rarely economic — it requires stripping the existing roof covering in the area of the array installation. Retrofit applications almost always use on-roof. For new builds where the choice is open, in-roof has clear cost and aesthetic advantages.
Are warranty terms different for in-roof vs on-roof?
Material warranties (panels, mounting hardware) are identical. Installation warranty is identical for both at our standard 20-year insurance-backed coverage. The difference is at the structural warranty layer — NHBC, LABC and Premier all accept both system types, but require manufacturer documentation that in-roof systems have BBA certification or equivalent.
FHS 2027 deadline approaching

Get an FHS-compliant solar quote in 48 hours

Tell us your plot details — ground floor area, location and target start-on-site date. We return a fully-costed system sized to Part L 2026 (40% PV rule), with the SAP/HEM compliance pack included.